In firefighting decision making, classical decision making and cue-based decision making represent two distinct approaches. Classical decision making is structured, analytical process where responders assess all available options, weigh outcomes, and select the most rational choice. It is ideal for predictable environments but often too slow for the fast paced, high risk situations firefighters face. In contrast, cue-based decision making, often associated with naturalistic decision making, relies on experience and recognition of patterns or cues in the environment. Firefighters use intuition and past knowledge to quickly assess situations and act decisively. This method is faster and better suited to dynamic, high-pressure incidents.

Agreed DE Shadoin, Classical decision making is valuable in stable environments, but its slower pace doesn’t match the urgency of most fireground scenarios. Cue-based decision making, grounded in experience and pattern recognition, allows firefighters to react swiftly and effectively under pressure—making it the more practical approach in high-risk, fast-evolving incidents.